Divergent is
driven by a unique and powerful premise. The story takes place in a dystopian
world that has been divided into “factions” based on a person’s dominant
personality trait and way of viewing the world: Abnegation, Dauntless, Amity,
Erudite, and Candor. As someone who loves to study culture, psychology, and
especially personality, I found the concept fascinating. The main character,
Tris, leaves her Abnegation family behind to enter the brave, wild, and most
importantly, free world of the Dauntless. There is plenty of material for an
awesome book right there as Tris struggles in a new society to find her source
of courage and inner strength, but as the plot develops, the story takes some awesome
and unexpected twists. The result is action packed, romantic, poignant, and
thought-provoking. (And the fact that my upcoming YA novel is titled Dauntless is only a small part of why I enjoyed it so much :)
Books
two and three take their own unique twists and turns as we delve
further into this society, why it is breaking apart, and how it came to
exist. And I loved every step of the way. Veronica Roth is a confessing
Christian, and although the books are not Christian per se, I saw much
more light, hope, and redemption than in other dystopian novels I have
read. The main character makes one choice in book three that many
Christians will not feel comfortable with, but it is handled delicately.
Although I would have made a different choice as an author, the
decision did seem to fit the plot, and I understood why Roth went in
that direction.
I’ve heard people say these books aren’t well written, and
to that I say: give me a break! I can only assume they mean something about
these books did not live up to their preconceived notions of good writing, or
perhaps that they are writers who are upset that this woman didn’t follow all
the rules that they so meticulously adhere to and she succeeded anyway. No, Roth did not follow every
“rule” of writing. She was a little heavy handed with the narrative summary, did
not always place readers firmly in the scene, and sometimes drifted in and out
of scenes without scene breaks. And you know what—who cares?!?! The books are
mesmerizing. People love them, buy them, and tell their friends to buy them. In
my opinion that is what makes a book great--the ability to move the reader--not an arbitrary set of rules.
That being said, I thought book three was the weakest. Books
one and two have a single first person narrator. Book three has two first
person narrators, and while I didn’t mind this choice, it was not handled as
well as it could have been. I often forgot whose point of view I was in, which
says to me that the point of views should have been more distinctive. That small
distraction aside, I still thought it was a great book.
Minor spoiler alert –
but keep reading anyway. A lot of people hate the ending of this trilogy,
but they are usually the ones who didn’t know in advance that it would be sad.
So I’m telling you straight out, the ending is sad. I went into the book aware
of that fact, and was able to enjoy and appreciate the redemptive resolution, which
I found quite powerful and satisfactory. In fact, my very favorite quote of the
entire trilogy is found at the end.
Since I was
young, I have always known this: Life damages us, every one. We can't escape
that damage. But now, I am also learning this: We can be mended. We mend
each other.
If you were in the world of Divergent, which faction do you think you would be and why?
