Typical male crusaders |
Generally women supplied water and
provisions and tended the wounded. But it was also considered proper for them
to man launching weapons and shoot bows and arrows from a distance. According
to Islamic legends of the crusades, there might have been some women disguised
as knights fighting on the front lines, although European records do not concur
on this issue. Certainly in times of desperation, women throughout history have
done what they must and fought for their lives.
An actual, historical, "Children’s Crusade" had two waves
in the early 1200s. Thousands of children followed visionary young teens and
set off on crusade, but there is no record of any reaching the Holy Land. Many
died along the way, others turned back, and it seems some might have been lost
at sea. I wanted to complete that legend, while still presenting the vast
complexities of the crusades.
Now to the toughest question you might be asking, should the
crusades have been fought at all? In the beginning, the Christian countries of
Europe were trying to turn the tide of hundreds of years of Muslim invasion and
oppression. They wanted to kick the Muslims out of Europe and take back land
lost by their Christian brothers and sisters in the Byzantine part of the
world. I would contend that those reasons were as solid and justifiable as
those fueling any war in history. But war is messy.
From the start motives were mixed. Some
wanted power and money while others had altruistic motives. Sometimes crusaders
from different European countries cooperated; sometimes they undermined each
other and broke treaties that other groups had made. Some crusades were led by
strong, chivalrous leaders, and others turned into riotous mobs. And almost
always the new crusaders from Europe failed to understand their enemy and the
complex social structure of the Middle East.
I think you'll enjoy the way I handled the potentially tricky subject of the crusades in Courageous. I attempt to take an honest look at both sides, showing honor to the Muslim natives, while still examining some difficult aspects of their religion and culture. This is one fictional adventure you won't want to miss out on.
Forgive me if I've said this before, or something like it, but could there be an element of criticism or ridicule in the mention of women in Islamic chronicles? Depicting women as somwhow 'unnatural' for taking part in fighting, or men as weak for needing women to protect them?
ReplyDeleteYou would probably know more about this then me, but I cannot think of any examples of Muslim women who took on any kind of military role, as I don't think this was considered acceptable in thier culture.
One example I can think of, although it comes from later was Edward I's wife, Eleanor of Castille, who accompanied him on Crusade in the later 13th century. There's no evidence that she fought, but she was certainly there as one of thier children was born near Acre. (There is a sweet, but almost certainly untrue story about her sucking the poison out of a wound inflicted during a failed assassination attempt on her husband). Love or loathe old Longshanks, those two were so head over heels, its really rather sweet to think he took his wife almost everywhere with him.
I agree that the Muslims would have seen it as a negative for women to fight.
DeleteFor interested blog readers, "God's Battalions" by Prof. Rodney Stark is a good starting point on the Crusades. It's an accessible read.
ReplyDeleteAlso, those who wanted to go on crusade were supposed to consult with their parish priest since it was a serious undertaking. Some did, others didn't.